Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CWSED. <br />COMMISSION'S COMMENTS <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright expressed concern that if Plan C were used it would require a variance <br />and thus set the stage for a precedent. He was firmly opposed to that possibility. He <br />thought with some careful consideration Plan D might work. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti suggested that the RV could be stored off-site, if nothing else can <br />be worked out. She could not support the plans as presented. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh said the design that makes sense is Plan C, but he could not support <br />that plan. He felt Mr. Griffen's best choice was to choose between the "granny" unit and the <br />RV storage, but not try for both. <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern felt that Plan C would also be better, but could not support the concept. <br />She felt the applicant would have to redesign the plan to accommodate a one-story unit for <br />living quarters and the RV, and keep it close to the existing structure. If that were not <br />feasible, then he would have to make a choice between the two structures. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk agreed with Chairman Mallern's comments and said he would <br />support staffs recommendation for denial. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan said of the two plans he would favor Plan C, but could not support the <br />applicant. He suggested the applicant consider a single story for the RV and have the <br />"granny" flat use the basement area. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Michelotti, seconded by Commissioner McGuirk for <br />denial without prejudice of Case UP-91-20, and denial of Case V-91-13. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Horan, Hovingh, McGuirk, Michelotti, and Chairman Mahern <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-91-53 was entered and adopted denying Case UP-91-20 as motioned. <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-91-54 was entered and adopted denying Case V-91-13 as motioned. <br /> <br />Minutes Planning COmmission <br />August 28, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />- <br />