PC 08/28/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chairman Mahern asked if there is any way the applicant can erect a two-story structure and keep it within a 15 feet height. Mr. Iserson said it does not appear possible to provide storage for an RV and living quarters in that amount of space. He further explained that the second story of the accessory structure would be able to be seen from the street; this was also objectionable. Commissioner Michelotti observed that it appeared the rear elevation would be the most imposing part of the structure for the neighbors. Mr. Iserson agreed that would be true. Commissioner Horan asked staff why this structure is any different than the many garages underneath bedrooms in Vintage Hills and Pleasanton Heights. Mr. Iserson replied than when a garage is attached to a building and is physically integrated with a building it is considered as part of the main structure. This is a case where the structure is detached and there are different rules for detached accessory structures. He added that there is a carport connection between the main part of the house and the proposed structure. Discussion ensued as to the height of the proposed structures. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. ~ James Griffen, 1 Roman Eagle Court, represented the application. He stated that he needs the unit because of the illness of his mother-in-law, who now lives in Miami, but can no longer live alone; the RV structure is needed to shield the vehicle from the elements and also from view. He noted that a plan was approved in 1986 for the structure; however, he was unable to finance the construction at that time. He wants to build living quarters that would be suitable for an elderly person and wheelchair accessible. He noted that he does not want to obstruct the views of the neighbors and would like to comply with all their concerns. He explained in great length the layout of the proposed structure, pointing out that the topography is difficult to work with. He agreed there is room under his house for living quarters but indicated water seepage would be a problem. Mr. Griffen said he could build an attached "granny" unit but felt he would have to install a flat roof which he considered unsuitable. Chairman Mahern asked if the "granny" unit would all be at ground level. Mr. Griffen agreed that it would be. The Commission questioned the applicant as to how access would be made from the main house to the "granny" unit. Chairman Mahern asked if grading would make the elevation more accessible. Mr. Griffen advised that if grading is done, he would experience flooding in the house. Mr. Griffen further clarified the location with pictures. Minute. Planning COmmission August 28, 1991 Page 3 I. .