Laserfiche WebLink
<br />GP-91-S. Citv of Pleasant on <br />Application to amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan to delete reference to <br />light rail transit along the abandoned Southern Pacific corridor, and/or to modify or <br />delete the "transportation corridor" shown along the north side of Stanley Boulevard <br />between First Street and Valley Avenue. <br /> <br />Application continued to September 11, 1991. <br /> <br />PUD-89-16-1M. Revnolds & Brown <br />Application for a ml\ior modification to the approved Planned Unit Development for <br />Pleasanton Square Shopping Center to allow the installation of an additional monument <br />sign located at 6030 Johnson Drive. Zoning for the property is PUD (planned Unit <br />Development) - Industrial/Commercial and Office District. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson presented the staff report recommending denial of Case <br />PUD-89-16-1M. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti suggested there might be some area where a small drive-through <br />sign might be located. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />~ Tom Terrill, 6685 Owens Drive, represented the application. He explained that Taco Bell <br />did not wish to wait any longer for a major modification for the shopping center because they <br />feel their directional signs are not visible enough. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh asked Mr. Terrill to clarify the existing signage. <br /> <br />Mr. Terrill stated that Taco Bell has worked hard on the architecture of the building. <br />However, they feel the lack of a drive-through sign is very detrimental to their business and <br />does not allow them to compete with other restaurants in town. He continued to say that <br />Taco Bell is willing to take off one of their building signs in order to get the monument sign. <br />He felt that the monument sign was the best solution for Taco Bell. <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern asked Mr. Terrill which sign they would be willing to eliminate. Mr. <br />Terrill said Taco Bell would be willing to eliminate the sign on the east wall of the building <br />which is the patio side. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh asked Mr. Terrill where they would place the monument sign should <br />it be approved. Mr. Terrill said they would place it 120 ft. from the main driveway. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti felt that Taco Bell could be seen pretty well as it is; she indicated <br />she was agreeable to having a small directional sign, but did not favor a monument sign. <br /> <br />Minutes Planning co..ission <br />August 28, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 19 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />- <br />