Laserfiche WebLink
<br />requirement for all wells in the area so no one can draw water out. This does not impede <br />the flow of water underneath. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti called attention to the condition regarding a trash enclosure. It <br />was concluded that Condition 3.e. be eliminated. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />COMMISSION'S COMMENTS <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh felt that this project meets the housing needs of the City and <br />supported the application. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti said she initially had some concerns about the possible walled <br />effect, but felt that situation had changed with articulation and an interesting roof line. She <br />would like for staff to work with the applicant regarding the corners of the buildings; she <br />supported the idea of a chainlink fence along the Arroyo. She felt that the developer had <br />made the changes requested and could support the project. <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern said even though the project was much improved over the Summerhill <br />project, she still could not vote for approval. She did like the design better, and the height <br />was reduced. She still had a big problem with density and some of the distances between the <br />buildings, feeling they were too close together. She felt that at the prices being asked, a <br />buyer's quality of life would be affected. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk said he had not been particularly pleased with the Summerhill <br />project, but felt big strides had been made with Signature. He felt the variations, placement <br />and height were superior and he could support the project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright suggested that the name "Marbella" be changed to something else. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan said he felt this project was far superior to the Summerhill project. In <br />response to Chairman Mahern's concern about a depreciated quality of life for those who <br />purchased the units, he felt that would not be true. He felt that people do not have to <br />purchase them. <br /> <br />A color pallet was passed around for review. Commissioner Michelotti wished to discuss the <br />colors, noting that the Design Review Board wanted some variation of color but no <br />"rainbows." The Commission concluded they would also like some variation, but nothing <br />too bright. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Hovingh, seconded by Commissioner McGuirk <br />making the PUD fmdings for the proposed development plan as listed in the staff report; and <br /> <br />Minutes Planning Commission <br />August 28, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 17 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />- <br />