PC 07/24/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ Commissioner Wright stated that when he voted for Measure M, he voted to protect the Ridge. He questioned Mr. Lee as to whether the City is just setting guidelines as far as the 2,640 units space and the possibility of developing 7,000 acres. His intent in voting for Measure M was to keep structures off the Ridge, and felt that the other side of the Ridge can do what they want. Mr. Lee replied there are two factors at work: First, the City of Pleasanton was successful in getting LAFCQ's approval for including those 7,000 acres in our Sphere of Influence. Second, the majority of the Committee felt that the 7,000 acres should be in Pleasanton. Chairman Mahern noted that she has observed density transfer in the City of Irvine with one property owner and questioned Mr. Lee about the mechanics of dealing with a larger number of owners. Mr. Lee indicated that all the details have not yet been worked out but if each individual property owner is not treated fairly, the density transfer program will not work. Chairman Mahern asked Mr. Lee how much of the land under discussion is above 670 ft. elevation. Mr. Lee responded that all of the land is over 670 ft. Chairman Mahern asked if there is a conceptual plan for a road up the face of the Ridge. Mr. Lee said there is a conceptual plan for a roadway, along with hypothetical development of residences and water systems. He said it was estimated that infrastructure would cost about $63 million; if a road were not built, people would have to go down Cowing Road and into the intersection near 1-580, which is contrary to people's normal driving habits. Commissioner Hovingh suggested that a parameter analysis depicting the economic impact of the project on the community would be helpful. Mr. Lee said this information could be researched. Chairman Mahern told the audience the Commission is very aware of the emotional issues involved in the subject. She stated the Commission's task is to hear testimony and weigh whether or not the report before them tonight is ready to go to the ballot. She asked that they restrict their comments to that issue. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Robert Doyle, Assistant General Manager of the East Bay Regional Park District, presented a slide show of the Ridgelands which pointed out the physical characteristics. He noted that Sinbad Canyon is a major drainage area and that care must be taken not to damage that area. He stressed that areas good for development purposes are also good for recreation development and urged that the Commission carefully consider this. The Park District has a very strong concern about development being concentrated next to Regional Park property. They are concerned about possible drainage problems; what kind of messages are being sent to the taxpayers; and if only the steepest parts of the Ridge would be left for park use. He stated that he felt the Committee report does not address all the issues and that there are conflicting areas in the report. Minutes Planning Commission July 24, 1991 Page 7 ,. .