PC 07/10/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

,- not feel that noise would be a problem for seven bours two Sundays a month. Sbe was also pleased that PLA is willing to work with PRA if approval comes about. Commissioner McGuirk said he moved here in 1984 and has not seen much change in the downtown area. He felt the project was not a "silver bullet" for the downtown economy, but did think it would help. He expressed his wholehearted support. Commissioner Hovingh said even though he is impressed with the proposed project, he would like to receive more input regarding some kind of parking lot consolidation for the east side of Main Street. He would also like a staff report to address rolling stock issues. He felt this project would not do everything the downtown needs, but could be a good start. Commissioner Horan said he enthusiastically supports the proposed project. He encouraged the PRA to "go for it" right now; to get together and write grants; get a public relations committee together; get the private parking lot owners together and talk. He did not think parking would be a problem at all; if it overflows the downtown, then there are avenues to consider. r- Commissioner Wright agreed with the rest of the Commission in their support of the project. He suggested that (1) the PRA procure some kind of information about the possibility of the train going into Livermore; (2) work on trail compatibility; (3) get information on excursion versus transportation regulations; and (4) provide an anticipated schedule for train stops so that people can know how much time will be available to shop and browse downtown. He fully supported the concept. Chairman Mahern asked Mr. Swift what steps would the PRA now need to take. Mr. Swift said the group would have to get Council approval; with that conceptual support they can go to Alameda County for approval; at some point it would go to the Design Review Board and again to the Planning Commission. He noted that many permits would need to be obtained. Chairman Mahern agreed with her colleagues in support of the concept. She felt the train would stimulate the downtown area and give it historical significance. However, she cautioned the group that safety issues and regulations must be strictly addressed; that some sort of schedule needs to be worked out so that people who ride the train will have some time to spend in downtown Pleasanton; that some kind of funding mechanism be in place; and that PUC and EIR reports must be addressed. Commissioner Michelotti added that she would be in favor of having the "clickety clack" type of rail to get the historical flavor. A motion was made by Commissioner Horan, seconded by Commissioner McGuirk that as a concept the Commission finds the applicant's proposal to have great merit; however, the Commission cannot make a specific decision at this time, but enthusiastically support the PRA in their efforts. r- Minutes Planning COmmission July 10, 1991 Page 8 ,. .