Laserfiche WebLink
<br />enough to support the roof mounted dish antenna. He also did not think it was fair to <br />approve a 65 foot tower when Burger King was refused a 20 foot pole. <br /> <br />Twyla Murphy, 3231 Clifford Circle, stated she is opposed to the system inasmuch as she is <br />fearful of the possible effects of microwave transmissions. She said she would prefer to <br />move from the area rather than take the chance that it could damage her children. <br /> <br />Nancy Roach, 3290 Marilyn Court, spoke in opposition to the system. She felt that every <br />time another system that emits microwave transmissions is built, that a certain amount of <br />danger to health is increased. She thought if it were approved it should be moved farther <br />away from the homes. <br /> <br />Judy Poffenbarger, resident of Parkside, spoke in support of the application. She felt that <br />people were making a big deal of the possible hazardous effects of the system. She thought <br />they could trust the professionals' opinion, and further added she would prefer to be able to <br />communicate in case of another earthquake than do without the tower. She said those <br />speaking in opposition do not represent all the people on Parkside. <br /> <br />Dan Murphy, a resident of Parkside, expressed concern that even though the report <br />completed by the consultant stated there were no dangers to health from microwave <br />transmissions, that this information could be in error. He felt there was simply not enough <br />information available to rule out possible adverse effects on humans. He suggested that even <br />water beds, clock radios, and microwave ovens emitted a certain amount of radiation and that <br />various literature supported that theory. He highly recommended that should the tower be <br />approved that it be moved farther back. <br /> <br />Mark Sweeney retumed to the podium. He stated he has been a resident of Pleasanton for 8 <br />years. He wished to allay nearby residents' fears of the possible effects of microwave <br />transmissions from the tower. He said they chose that particular site because there really are <br />not that many large vacant sites available in Pleasanton; one of their requirements for a <br />building is that it be freestanding and single story. He felt people were worrying needlessly <br />about the dangers and would be willing to meet with them at any time and discuss the issues. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti asked Mr. Sweeney if he would agree to reduce the 10 foot wall to <br />8 feet. Mr. Sweeney said he would agree to that. <br /> <br />Peter Polson returned to the podium. He stated he is not a resident of the area; however, he <br />has heard a great deal of concern from the residents regarding possible health issues. He <br />noted that he has a number of degrees, including a PH.D in brain research; he has spent <br />much time studying the effects of ground radiation; and was a member of the committee for <br />setting up the ANSI standards. He reiterated that in his opinion there is no danger to the <br />community from microwave transmissions from this project. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Minute. Planning eo..i..ion <br />June 12, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br />