PC 04/24/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ is delayed, that the plan for the Bonde property should also be delayed. He reiterated that the main desire is to keep excess traffic off of Sycamore Road, and is opposed to traffic coming from Lund 1 and Lund 2. He said he has been to about 60 meetings on this matter and felt that some of the Alisal Improvement Club's requests could be attained, as he felt the requests of the Lund Ranch were granted to them. Commissioner Michelotti asked Mr. Van Wegen what he is specifically objecting. Mr. Van Wegen said he is opposed to the office and medium density which he feels is dumping onto Sycamore Road, according to the latest City plan that he has seen. He went to the map and showed her the location of concern. He thought there would be 600-700 trips per day dumped onto Sycamore from that area. He felt that problem needs to be solved. Mr. Swift clarified that Alternative 4 does not propose to extend the Mavridis road to the east; and indicated that office traffic would not be dumped onto Sycamore Road. He also noted that all four of the plans are interchangeable. Commissioner McGuirk discussed Mr. Van Wegen's comment that he wished to get on with the project. Commissioner McGuirk felt that Mr. Van Wegen would want to have the situation looked at as closely as possible. Mr. Van Wegen felt that whereas the majority of the residents agree right now, in two years or whatever the study might take, they might not agree. Mary Greene, 386 Sycamore Road, represented her parents, William and Catherine Greene. She presented pictures of their property, along with her written comments. She read her comments for the Commission, stating that the N. Sycamore Plan would cut their property in half, with one acre being destroyed. She said they have always been opposed to the plan and remain so. Chairman Mahern asked Ms. Greene if any of the four alternatives would be acceptable to her. Ms. Greene said they would not be acceptable, even though Alternative 2 is the only one that does not show a road going through her property. Stan Rathbone, 325 Ray Street, stated he feels that the developers all think they have the right to make a big profit; he felt he had the right to have ample water. He did not think it right for existing residents to possibly have to give up their water for future developers to make money. He felt the Commission should make it more difficult for developers. Ron Wacek, 5771 San Antonio Street, represented Mission Park Home Association. He stated they wish to go on record as endorsing none of the project ~ MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 24, 1991 Page 6 ,. -