My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/27/1991
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
PC 03/27/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:18:21 PM
Creation date
6/2/2005 11:54:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/27/1991
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 03/27/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />property site and he had concerns that it might be damaged by the children. He is <br />also concerned about the possibility of having 12 children next to his home <br />because he is putting in a pool. He said he would not want to have to pay for <br />extra liability insurance because of the facility. He said the issue is that Ms. <br />Whitbeck is working away from her home most of the day; he was also concerned <br />with the number of children allowed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh asked Mr. Zurich what he would do if this were simply a <br />family of 12 children. Mr. Zurich said the CC&R's would not have allowed a family <br />of that size to purchase the home. <br /> <br />Ms. Whitbeck returned to the podium. She said she also has spoken with Elaine <br />Arrington of the State Department about her facility and Ms. Arrington had no <br />problem with it. She has also spOken to the parents of those children that she <br />cares for and they had no problem with her working when the children are not <br />there. She said she has tried to explain to the neighbors how the situation will <br />work so they are aware of the facts. She said she does carry additional liability <br />insurance and did not think Mr. Zurich should be concerned. She assured the <br />Commission she would not let the children "bake" in the heat all summer, but <br />would take them to the pool or other places of amusement like Great America. <br />She said she would not allow the children to damage the Heritage Oak, but might <br />want to put a rope swing on it. She said she did not know that she needed a <br />~ conditional use permit until she was advised of this by Resources for Family <br />Development, and had no intention of operating illegally. As far as the bus stop, <br />she said she drives the children to the bus stop and waits until they leave. In <br />addition, she said she is the sole person who waits until the bus leaves. <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern asked if all the children leave when Ms. Whitbeck leaves. <br />Ms. Whitbeck said the children go with her when she leaves at 7:50am. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh commented that a Human Services report noted that about <br />800 spaces were needed for child care in the 9-10 age bracket in the Valley. State <br />law encourages day care so children will not have to stay alone while their parents <br />are still at work. He did not think it would affect the value of homes if a day care <br />is in the area and did not think the noise would be bad at all. He supported the <br />application. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti agreed with Commissioner Hovingh's comments. She <br />would encourage the neighbors to work with Ms. Whitbeck as facilities are <br />definitely needed. She did not think the noise would be that bad even if there are <br />12 children; she felt the neighbors would have to overlook a little noise. She <br />stated that since the State has reviewed the operation and has found that the <br /> <br />MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 27, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.