My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/13/1991
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
PC 03/13/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:18:13 PM
Creation date
6/2/2005 11:51:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/13/1991
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 03/13/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,-- <br /> <br />have to find a place to relocate dirt; however, this will be <br />addressed at the tentative map stage. <br /> <br />COMMENTS ON MIRADOR DRIVE EXTENSION TO BERNAL AVENUE <br /> <br />Donald MCKenzie, 790 E. Angela street, said he represents 489 <br />residents of Old Towne, Pleasanton Heights, and surrounding area <br />who signed the petition in favor of the extension of Mirador <br />Drive to Bernal Avenue, in the event that the Bonde project is <br />approved for development. He read the petition statement, <br />stating that people who signed the petition were not asked if <br />they were of voting age, but rather that they were residents at <br />the street address. The petitioners requested the extension for <br />the following reasons: The General Plan recommended the <br />extension to improve the traffic circulation; response time for <br />emergency vehicles to the area, such as fire trucks would be <br />shortened; over 78% of Old Towne and Pleasanton Heights favor <br />the extension of Mirador Drive. He also pointed out that staff <br />recommended the extension. <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern asked the audience how many of them favored the <br />extension of Mirador Drive. About four were in favor; 12 were <br />not; most did not respond. <br /> <br />,-- <br /> <br />Margo Kelly, 5157 Independence Drive, stated she is not in favor <br />of the Mirador Drive extension. She felt it would greatly <br />increase traffic on Independence Drive. She felt that the <br />traffic count portrayed in the EIR was inaccurate as it took <br />place in June 1990 when school was not in session. In addition, <br />she said the traffic on Bernal Avenue and Independence Drive is <br />already so heavy at times that she must wait a long time to make <br />a left turn onto Independence Drive. She felt that with the long <br />hill most people did not go the speed limit of 35 mph. She <br />thought that if the Mirador extension was made it would end up <br />going past her house on Independence Drive. She said she has <br />many concerns about the project, but right now her greatest <br />concern is with traffic. If the project is approved, she would <br />favor the elimination of "F" Street. <br /> <br />Kay Leedum, 673 Abbie street, was opposed to the Mirador Drive <br />extension. She thought a tremendous amount of grading would have <br />to be done to make the extension and she was opposed to that. In <br />addition, if fill was carried in to make the extension, she <br />thought that would put homes towering over her home. She did not <br />think that petitioners for the extension were thinking of those <br />people on Abbie Street, and those people did not have adequate <br />information. She felt the viewshed from her home would be <br />ruined. <br /> <br />Joan Tenbrink, 4265 Mirador Drive, was opposed to the Mirador <br />extension. She said she has had numerous animals killed on her <br />street because of the speeding traffic going down the hill. <br /> <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />MARCH 13, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.