Laserfiche WebLink
<br />approval would have an insignificant adverse effect on the <br />environment. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />commissioners Horan, Hovingh, MCGuirk, Michelotti, <br />and Chairman Mahern <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-91-8 was entered and adopted recommending <br />approval of the Negative Declaration prepared for Case PUD-90-19 <br />as motioned. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Michelotti, seconded by <br />Commissioner Hovingh recommending approval of Case PUD-90-19 <br />subject to the revised conditions of the staff report and listed <br />in Exhibit B, along with the following modifications: <br /> <br />o Amend Condition 2e as reflected in the memo; <br /> <br />o Correct typo in Condition 52 to reflect north instead <br />of south; <br /> <br />o That Condition 43 be approved as presented in the <br />February 27 memo; <br /> <br />o Add a condition to say that no building permits be <br />issued until it is determined that Pleasanton is not on <br />water rationing; <br /> <br />o That the extension of "c" Court to the western edge of <br />Stoneridge Drive be investigated before the tentative <br />map stage; that would include investigation of the <br />quarry road to Foothill Drive; <br /> <br />o That Lot 12 be reduced to 28,000 sq. ft. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />commissioners Horan, Hovingh, McGuirk, Michelotti, <br />and Chairman Mahern <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-91-9 was entered and adopted recommending <br />approval of Case PUD-90-19 as motioned. <br /> <br />KIIIUTIlS PLAlllfIJIG COIII(ISSIOIf FEBRUARY 27, 1991 Page 11 <br />