My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/10/1994
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
PC 08/10/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 2:36:30 PM
Creation date
6/2/2005 11:13:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/10/1994
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 08/10/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />new house is built on this lot. However, the purchaser of this lot could decide to keep the <br />two existing residences until such time that they built a new house. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Barker, Mr. Swift advised that all houses must have a sprinkler <br />system if outside the five minute response time or in a high fire hazard zone. This <br />remodeling project is outside the five minute response time and is significant enough to <br />warrant the addition of a sprinkler system. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh inquired of staff if the southeast portion of the development was a <br />geotechnically sensitive area. Mr. Swift advised that the 34 lots are on the flat portion of the <br />property, both north and south of the driveway, whereas the additional17 lots are on the <br />hilly, geotechnically sensitive area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh inquired as to the eventual use of the remaining 17 lots of the pun. <br />Mr. Swift advised these lots are not subdivided but they are still part of the PUD zoning. <br />New geotechnical information or new seismic policy would have to be established to make <br />them subdividable. Until that time, the area will remain as open space in the project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lutz inquired how extensive a rebuild can become and still be considered a <br />remodel. Mr. Beougher stated that a remodeling project must conform to current codes, <br />therefore, the definition of remodeling is ambiguous. Mr. Swift noted that the Building Code <br />does not address percentages of rebuild projects, and the Zoning Code does not apply. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner McGuirk, Mr. Swift stated that at build-out of this project, <br />there would be 33 new homes, the two homes on the lot in question, and Mr. Currin's home. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Jerry Dommer, 256 Sutter Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, represented this application as <br />the project architect. Mr. Dommer stated the staff report and the memorandum dated <br />8/10/94 are very thorough. He advised their intention was to update these homes, which are <br />60 to 80 years old, in order to give the development a better marketing advantage by visually <br />updating the existing homes. <br /> <br />Mr. Dommer stated Residence "B's" siding and roofing are leaking and the house is fairly <br />dark inside due to under-sized windows. They want to bring the house up to code in all <br />respects, structurally, electrically, plumbing, etc. They have combined the two bedrooms <br />into one large bedroom and added a second bedroom over the new garage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh inquired why they would expend so much money and resources to <br />update these houses when they are to be demolished in the near future. Mr. Dommer stated <br />that the development of Oak Tree Farms has been slower than anticipated and believes the <br />sales of lots will also be slow. Furthermore, they believe the usability of the two homes will <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />August 10, 1994 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.