Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commissioner Wright commented he had concern with freeway and pylon signs that could <br />have either direct, indirect, or internally illuminated signage. He would like to take <br />illumination away from signs on the rear of buildings facing the freeway. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift stated the number is limited to four tenant signs to a pylon sign. Staff is <br />compromising by allowing the illuminated signs, though the buildings will also be <br />illuminated. Commissioner Wright can concur with that since it is so specified. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh commented that he does not like the use of flags and hot air <br />balloons, especially visible to the freeway. Mr. Swift stated they are allowable only for <br />grand openings. <br /> <br />Regarding landscaping, Commissioner Wright would like to see a restriction to disallow <br />grouping two 70 foot parking lot view corridors together. He would like to see a maximum <br />of four parking spaces in a view corridor, whether they are handicapped or normal spots. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh stated his concern over the height of the pylon signs at 35 feet as <br />well as the relaxation of the number of parking lot trees. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Michelotti, seconded by Commissioner Wright, <br />approving and forwarding to the City Council Case PUD-81-30-28M/PUD-85-8-10M, subject <br />to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B," with the following modification: <br /> <br />Condition M 3.5 F -- no two view corridors can be adjacent to one another. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Michelotti, Finch, Wright and Chairman McGuirk <br />Commissioner Hovingh <br />Commissioner Mahern <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-94-10 was entered and adopted approving Case PUD-81-30-28M/ <br />PUD-85-8-10M as motioned. <br /> <br />f. Reouest of Zone 7 of Alameda Countv Flood Control and Water Conservation <br />District for a Detennination of Conformitv to the General Plan of the <br />"Rehabilitation of Arrovo de la Lal!Una (Line B)/Alamo Canal (Line Fl" <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report regarding the reconstruction of the Arroyo de la Laguna <br />canal banks. Staff finds it consistent with the General Plan and recommends approval. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />February 23, 1994 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />. <br />