PC 10/13/1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Raber stated he is prepared to have a soils engineer perform studies at the proposed second unit site, He is objecting to the City's denial of the second liInit because it is outside the building envelope. He feels that irrespective of any supporting ~aterial he may provide, the City will deny the application because it is outside the building ~nvelope. In response to Commissioner Finch, Mr. Raber advised he had fIrst asked the Homeowners Association's approval to subdivide his lot. This was denied because he did not get two-thirds approval from the other property owners. The Homeowners Association has ino jurisdiction over a second unit. In response to Commissioner Hovingh, Mr. Raber is unsure that th~ staff report is correct in stating his building envelope is 17,000 square feet. He further advi~ that there is not enough room to accommodate another self-contained unit south of hi.s house. The proposed second unit would be about 70 feet from his existing house. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CWSED. Commissioner Wright concurs with the staff findings denying the sllCond unit because it is located outside of the building envelope. He feels Mr. Raber can seek a modification to his PUD or seek a subdivision. Commissioner Hovingh supports the staff position. A motion was made by Commissioner Hovingh, seconded by C....mlssioner Wright, rmding that second units are subject to the locational requirem$ts of PUD-approved building envelopes and therefore may not be constructed outside the building envelope established by the PUD zoning. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Hovingh, Finch, Mahern, Wright, and Chairman McGuirk , None Commissioner Michelotti None Resolution No. PC-93-64 was entered and adopted approving SE!Cond units are subject to the locational requirements of PUD-approved building envelope/;. 2. COMMUNlCA nONS There were none. 1!h REFERRALS There were none. Planning Commission Minutes Page 13 October 13, 1993 I.' .