PC 09/08/1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Parejo stated he is willing to come before the Planning Commis ion for [mal approval once the house is designed. ~ Mr. Iserson stated that staff feels comfortable allowing a two-story 0 30 ft. portion, with the stated stipulations in the staff report, deleting the view easement, an increasing the Commission's control by bringing the design review application bac to the Commission to ensure that the house is designed sensitive to the view. Chairman McGuirk clarified that staff was recommending a 120' set ack, 1,000 sq. ft. second story limitation, 35 ft. north side setback, and the second sto could be set back from the fIrst story building wall but not to the full 150' setback. It would then come back before the Planning Commission. Mr. Parejo fmds these restrictions acceptable. Mr. lserson stated that the City Planners encourage applicants to co e in with a preliminary plan, a simple sketch, location of second story, etc. to get feedback rom staff. Mr. Parejo is encouraged to come to City staff with a preliminary sketch plan, d if it is felt that it meets the intent of the PUD conditions, the detailed drawings can th n be drawn. Mr. parejo requested that once he gets approval of the preliminary drawi gs from City staff, he come before the Planning Commission for approval. The Planning ommission would then not be involved in the details of the fInal elevations. Commissioner . chelotti further stated that once the Zoning Administrator approves the final plans, it can s '11 come before the Planning Commission, as they have the right to appeal the design if t does not conform to the PUD intentions. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. ~ Commissioner Wright stated that he felt Mr. Parejo made every g with Mr. Zuffa and the view easement, which is an issue that is not equired. He feels that Condition 3k should be amended to say that the 30 ft. height may be permitted, and the second story portion shall be maintained on the southern portion of e house with an architectural setback of the second-story element, This seems to be workable compromise for both parties. He also feels Mr. Parejo should not have to go thr ugh another design review step with the Commission. Furthermore, if the property is ld, the new owner will be responsible to seek approval of the proposed building design wi the stated conditions, not the applicant. Commissioner Mahern supports the project and concurs with the ch ges to Condition 3k and Condition 6. She doesn't feel Mr. Parejo needs to go through a s nd design review. A motion was made by Commi<<<<ioner Hovingh, seconded by Co . ioner Michelotti, rmding the project would not have a significant effect on the env' onment and recommending approval oC the Negative Declaration prepared Co Case PUD-93-01. AYES: NOTES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Hovingh, Mahern, Michelotti, Wright d Chairman McGuirk None None Commissioner Finch ROLL CALL VOTE PJanning Commission Minutes Page 8 September 8, 1993