PC 08/11/1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ Commissioner Michelotti concurs with the views of Commissioner ern, and is also in favor of wording Condition 27 so that all three parties come to some agreement. Regarding the Glenn easement, it is Commissioner Michelotti's opinion that it sn't make sense not to eliminate the easement and thus eliminate another driveway on Foo " Road. Commissioner Michelotti concurs with the gates as proposed. The point from Mr. Donald about establishing defInite boundaries is valid. She supports the right of th property owners to be able to say where they want that gate. Commissioner Hovingh advised that he concurs with the rest of the changes to the conditions. However, he indicated that he will vote ainst the PUD modification because he believes good design dictates that the extens on of C Court goes into the western end of Stoneridge Drive as approved in the initial PUD. He believes the Commission is expending a lot of time dealing with the Glenn ease nt problem consisting of approximately ten trips per day, when roughly a thousand trips day will be generated by the other residents necessitating heavy usage of Foothill Road, w ereby the thousand trips per day should be funneled onto Stoneridge Drive and give those pIe the option of going directly into Hacienda Business Park without having to make left an right hand turns onto Foothill Road. Chairman McGuirk concurred that the easement was just bad plann" g and didn't make much sense. He would like to see the gates just off B Court and at the M ller property line, and would like Boulevard Development to work with the landowners to to improve that road as much as they can since they are being impacted because of the d elopment. Chairman McGuirk believes that the natural habitat area could potentially cau problems to the amphibians and/or people. He also believes this development will b an added feature to the north end of the city and believes it would be nice to go and admire it, thus, he is not in favor of the gated community. Chairman McGuirk welcomes the c ge from townhouses to single family homes. He concurs with the rest of the statements of e Commission concerning the conditions of approval and supports the PUD modin tion. In response to Commissioner Michelotti, Mr. Higdon explained Con ition 15 to be one-half the cost of undergrounding the utility lines for the length of the dev lopment's frontage on Foothill Road. Commissioner Finch believes this project to be a very complete and detailed plan. He is happy to see the size of the single family homes and commends the eveloper for an excellent job in design. The fact that Foothill Road is now going to be lighted adds to the safety of the residents. He stated that he cannot support Dr. Glenn' request to maintain his easement because of safety reasons. A motion was made by Commissioner Wright, seconded by Co . ioner Mahem, making a f'mding that no new information of significance has be n discovered which would affect the previous approval of the Negative Declaration ~ r PUD-90-19, making PUD f'mdings for the proposed development plan for Case PUD- 19-2M, and recommending approval of Case PUD-90-19-2M, subject to the nditions listed in Exhibit "B. I. n Planning Commission Minutes August 11, 1993 Page 10