Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A motion was made by Commill.stoner Hovingh, seconded by ommiAAioner Wright, to <br />consider this item at its July 28 meeting if the Steering Co ttee is done with the <br />process, and if the Steering Committee is not done this item ould be considered at the <br />first regular meeting in August or at a future regular meeting <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Hovingh, Mahem, Michelotti, Wri ht and Chairman McGuirk <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh noted that. he does not want the process t .push" the Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti stated that the wording included in the greement regarding <br />Measure M did not make sense to her and should be corrected. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed the boundary issue, stating that the b undary line should be <br />redesigned to include only the area that can be seen from the V ey floor extending to the <br />western boundary of the lots at the top of the Ridge. <br /> <br /> <br />The Commission noted that the joint Agreement was of no practi consequence unless <br />Alameda County signed the Agreement; the "veto. power it give Pleasanton is good only if <br />the property owners of concern (face of the Ridge) never annex. It was further noted that it <br />would be better to get a decent plan and have the property own s annex, thereby giving <br />Pleasanton the control it should have in this area. <br /> <br />~ MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br /> <br />There were none. <br /> <br />1... MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br /> <br />There were none. <br /> <br />1.L Future Planninl!: Calendar <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes July 14, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br />