Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chairman Hovingh asked who had initiated the request for the or ' <br />replied that City Attorney, Michael Roush, had received several call <br />and he thought it best to respond before someone actually wanted to <br /> <br /> <br />ceo Mr. Beougher <br />in the last six months <br />ut in such a business. <br /> <br />The Commission reluctantly said they would approve the draft or . <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commk..ioner Wright, seconded by Co <br />recommending approval of the draft ordinance for Case RZ-92-7 <br />and forwarding the draft ordinance to City Council for public h <br /> <br />. ioner McGuirk <br />attached as Exhibit A, <br />. and review. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />Commi"Sioners Mahern, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wri t and Chainnan <br />Hovingh <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-93-26 was entered and adopted approving C RZ-92-7 as motioned. <br /> <br />6. MATI'ERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br />There were none. <br /> <br />'L MAnERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br />There were none. <br /> <br />1.1l.. Future Planninl!: Calendar <br />No action required. <br /> <br />1J2. Actions of the Citv Council <br />No action required. <br /> <br />1&. Actions of the Zoninl!: Admini~rator <br />No action required. <br /> <br />1&. <br /> <br /> <br />fR I i R <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Swift commented that Council will get a report on June I revie . g the responsibilities <br />of the Design Review Board. At that time staff will ask Council if ey desire a Design <br />Review Board or a different manner of reviewing design applications <br /> <br />The Commission agreed that they wished to honor the Design Revie <br />resolutions as presented by staff tonight. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes May 12, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 15 <br />