Laserfiche WebLink
<br />concerned that the particular location for the proposed shop, which s a prime spot on Main <br />Street, is not the type of business the Downtown Association would favor for the image <br />business people are trying to attract. Other concems were: As the' workers are all <br />employees, who will keep the place clean? How do they handle dr p-off donations before <br />and after hours? He expressed concern that even signs saying "No rop-offs" would be <br />ignored as they are at St. Vincent de Paul further down on Main S eel. In regard to a need <br />for extra storage, he felt their merchandise must not be moving fast enough to need more <br />storage space. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh asked Mr. Takens if it is primarily the Main Str t location the <br />Association is opposed to. Mr. Takens agreed it is really the Main treet location, and the <br />concern about drop-offs and whether they would get scattered aroun town if people decide <br />to leave things after hours. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright questioned Mr. Takens as to whether he thou ht Hope Hospice would <br />be detrimental to other downtown businesses. Mr. Takens thought i was mainly the issue of <br />drop-offs on Main Street and was concerned that it would make that location look like St. <br />Vincent de Paul. That is certainly not the image businessmen want n the downtown area, <br />particularly with the revitalization effort going on. <br /> <br />Alexis Gass, 350-A Main Street, Clover Creek Shop adjacent to the roposed location, said <br />she realized the good Hope Hospice has done in Pleasanton; howev ,this would be the <br />second thrift store on Main Street with St. Vincent de Paul being on the other end of town. <br />She felt that even though Hope Hospice indicated they received a g deal on the rental, <br />there were other locations that would serve their purpose: one bein in Hopyard Village on <br />Valley Avenue, and the other was the vacant Bank of Pleasanton on block off Main Street. <br /> <br />Brian Dutchover, 5579 San Antonio Street, supported Ms. Gass' co ments. He, too, did <br />not think Hope Hospice would be harmonious with the revitalization ffort presently going on <br />downtown. His office is in a second floor building and as a landsca architect is rather <br />unaffected; however, he did not think that hours of 10:00 a.m. to 4: p.m. would be <br />conducive to increasing business downtown, which is what the Dow town Association is <br />trying to do. They are looking for businesses that stay open past 5: p.m. and on <br />weekends. He also felt that a side street would be preferred to a M n Street location. <br /> <br />Dorothea Barlett, 77 W. Angela Street, stated that even though she i in full support of Hope <br />Hospice as an organization, she is not in favor of the shop being nex to her art gallery. <br />When she was at her previous location, she felt the continual movin of the next door tenants <br />affected her. Her primary concern was with the 10 a.m.-4 p.m. hou s and did not think <br />those hours are conducive to shopping. Her second concern was wi drop-offs and was <br />afraid that would be an unsightly problem as it is at St. Vincent de P ul. She noted that the <br />back door to the building under discussion is every tenant's back doo. Many people use <br />that as a main entrance. She suggested that if the application is app oved, that a second site <br />be used for drop-offs and for sorting of merchandise. She also had ncerns about window <br />displays and noted that some of the Hope Hospice displays had items that were not clean. <br />She noted that she has art receptions in the evenings and that it is im rtant that the adjacent <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes April 14, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />