PC 01/27/1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

o Modify Condition 7.b. - The developer shall contrib te the project's pro-rata share of the noise analysis for the Stoneridge Drive pecific Plan area. o Add Condition 7.c. - Fees for the Mohr-Martin sewe extension, and the East Amador Relief Sewer extension shall be paid in acco dance with the terms of those benefit agreements. o Modify Condition 12 - The developer shall exercise -faith efforts to acquire Lot "B" of Tract 6505 and Lot "B" of Tract 164 in order to merge those parcels with Parcel "A". If successful, this me ger shall be completed prior to recordation of the final map. o Modify Condition 34.c. - Second sentence shall be odified to read: Prior to the close of escrow on a lot, the developer shall provo e the City a LOMA from FEMA, (FEMA form), or the developer shall p y the flood insurance costs for the lot until such time as the letter of map a endment is received. o Modify Condition 36.f. - The development shall com ly with the City's Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance to be in effect at the time of the Final Map. o Add Condition 36.n. - Storm drain line in public servO e easement located on the school parcel shall be relocated to the Village 3 p vate street system. ~ o Modify Condition 38 - The applicant shall obtain an e croachment permit from Zone 7, Fish and Game, and the Army Corps of Engi eers for all work within the Arroyo Mocho, as required by law. Mr. Swift further noted that Councilmember Tom Pico had raised se era! questions and concerns. He was concerned about sidewalks not being on both side of all the streets in the subdivision. This PUD was approved with sidewalks on both sides f the streets in Village 1, both sides of Stoneridge Drive, both sides in front of the school, d on the other side of that street across the frontage of Village 2 and into Village 3. Villa 2 area is all small private streets that basically have garage doors directly off of a narro street and there are no sidewalks on those private streets. The sidewalks in Village 2 m der through the greenbelt and all the units are linked by that greenbelt sidewalk. ViI ge 3 was approved with a sidewalk only on one side. The loop street with the connecto street has sidewalks on one side. Mr. Swift added that the Planning Commission can conditi n that there be sidewalks on both sides; however, staff feels that this would greatly fect the size of the front yards and also the parking areas. Mr. Pico had also raised an issue regarding the location recently ado ted by the Airport Land Use Commission airport protection area and how that affects the proj t and the school site ~ Planning Commission Minutes January 27, 1993 Page 4