Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r- <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commi~~ioner Mahern, seconded by Co . ioner Michelotti <br />that inasmuch as the Planning Cornrni..~ion cannot C"md that there is an economic reason <br />to eliminate the Design Review Board they recommend to Counc' the Design Review <br />Board be kept in place as it currently exists. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />Cornrnk~ioners Finch, Mahem, Michelotti, right and Chainnan <br />Hovingh <br />None <br />Cornrni...,ioner McGuirk <br />None <br /> <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-93-07 was entered and adopted recommending that the Design <br />Review Board be kept in place as it currently exists. <br /> <br />to. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br /> <br />There were none. <br /> <br />L. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br /> <br />Item 7.a. <br /> <br />Future Planninl! Calendar <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />Item 7.b. <br /> <br />Actions of the Citv Council <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />Item 7.c. <br /> <br />Actions of the Desim Review Board <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />Item 7.d. <br /> <br />Actions of the Zoninl! Administrator <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes January 27. 1993 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br />