Laserfiche WebLink
<br />could not happen. He could not support the project at this point an really did not like what <br />he saw. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh asked staff what happens if they deny the proj . Mr. Swift said the <br />applicant can appeal to City Council or the applicant can request th t the PUD be modified. <br />If the applicant redesigns the tentative map, the entire design would have to be changed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Finch felt that two or three houses could be remov <br />affordability. This would make the existing setbacks and yards lar <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh stated he is very unhappy with the project and <br />deny it. He did appreciate that the applicant is working with Mr. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commi"Sioner Wright, seconded by Co <br />stating that the required tentative map fmdings cannot be made <br />6545, <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br /> <br />without jeopardizing <br />r. <br /> <br />at it pains him to have to <br />ilcox and Mr. Augusta. <br /> <br />. ioner McGuirk <br />and denying Tract <br /> <br />Commissioners Mahern, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wrig , and Chairman Hovingh <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-93 was entered and adopted denying Tract 6 45 as motioned. <br /> <br />The applicant was informed he has 15 days in which to appeal the ecision to City Council. <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br /> <br />There were none. <br /> <br />1.. <br /> <br />MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br /> <br />Item 7,a, <br /> <br />Future Plannin2 Calendar <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />Item 7,b, <br /> <br />Actions of the Citv Council <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />October 28, 1992 <br />Page 11 <br />