My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 09/23/1992
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC 09/23/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2013 3:46:06 PM
Creation date
5/25/2005 3:19:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/23/1992
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 09/23/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,- <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright asked Mr. Salmon for further clarification as to how and who handled <br />the pavilion construction. Mr. Salmon stated he paid the spa comp y for the pavilion on <br />top of the decking, but hired Mr. Jerez to make sure that every thin was done in proper <br />order. He agreed with Commissioner Wright that it was Mr. Jerez' responsibility to install <br />the deck and to make sure that a permit was obtained for the deck d pavilion. <br /> <br />Commissioner Finch asked Mr. Jerez if he is a licensed contractor, d whether he is <br />licensed to construct buildings and if he has a B-1 license. Mr. Jef z responded that he is a <br />licensed contractor and a landscape designer; he did not have a B-1 license to construct <br />buildings. Mr. Jerez said he has a license to landscape which inclu es the installation of <br />decking. <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Jerez came to the podium. <br /> <br />Mr. Jerez went on to say that in the last months he has been accus of many things by the <br />City and by other people. He felt that just because his sign might e up on the premises or <br />on his truck that he is responsible for the construction. He felt tha just because his use of <br />English was not the best did not mean anything; he also felt that ju t because he had moved <br />to Blackhawk that people did not like it. <br /> <br /> <br />,-- <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Finch's questioning, Mr. Jerez said h was hired by Mr. <br />Salmon to supervise the entire project. Mr. Jerez stated that he ha instructed the contractor <br />who actually did the construction to get the permit, which he thoug t he had done. He <br />further responded to questioning and stated that he instructed his su contractor to go to the <br />Planning Department with plans for the deck, pavilion and the land aping and that he <br />thought it had been approved. However, he stated he did not actu ly see the permit. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh stated that the issue tonight is not whether Mr. <br />but whether the pavilion should remain. Mr. Beougher agreed thi <br />State Board is dealing with Mr. Jerez. <br /> <br /> <br />ment had reported Mr. <br />a letter stating that after <br />is performing work <br />State Licensing Board <br /> <br />Commissioner Finch pointed out to Mr. Jerez that it was his respo sibility to make sure his <br />subcontractor actually got the permit; Mr. Jerez agreed that it was is responsibility and <br />apologized. <br /> <br />Mr. Beougher stated that the City Attorney and the Planning Dep <br />Jerez to the State Licensing Contractor's Board. They had receiv <br />preliminary review Mr. Jerez was in violation of Code 7110, whic <br />without proper permits from the City. He has been reported to th <br />and they are dealing with Mr. Jerez. <br /> <br />erez has a license or not, <br />was true and that the <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes September 23. 1992 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.