PC 09/23/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

..- pay for right-of-way from two adjacent neighbors to the east and to p y $45,000 for improvements beyond the limits of the project. He concluded by req esting that Condition 14 be deleted. In response to Commissioner Michelotti's question, Mr. Swift review and clarified Mr. Alexander's comments. Commissioner Michelotti expressed concern that the homes planned fi r the sites may be very large homes that will overlook other homes and invade their privacy. She was very concerned that Lots 1, 2, and 3 would overlook the houses in the Ro pointe subdivision, as far as the mass and size of house is concerned. She discussed Lot 4 ith Mr. Lavey and Mr. Alexander. Mr. Swift clarified for the Commission that this is a PUD in the full t sense and this is the only time it will come before the Planning Commission. Furthermor, the Design Review Board has already seen the development plan and will not see it agai . Ron Theile, architect for the project, also represented the application. He explained to the Commission that the south elevation is the back of the house and that the north elevation had been mislabeled. This has been noted at the Design Review Board Ie el. ..- Chairman Hovingh stated he had some problems with Lot 3.b. and th back of the garage and west elevation. He thought it appeared to be too much of a three sided treatment. He was also concerned about the west elevation of Lot 4.b. Commissioner Wright had some concerns about the roof coming out ver the back door of the garage on Lot 4.b. He further discussed Lot 4.a. with Mr. Theil. Some discussion ensued as to whether the Commission had the most urrent drawings. Chairman Hovingh recommended that the case be continued for two eeks so that they could see the most current plan, as it would not come before them again; ommissioners Michelotti and Wright agreed with that comment; the applicant was n t in favor of this. After further discussion it was concluded that the large blueprints wer the most recent plan and that it could be taken care of tonight. Mr. Theile noted that the lueprints they are reviewing at this point are also what the Design Review Board has 1 ked at. The Commission further discussed the roof lines and pad elevation wi h Mr. Swift. Mr. Swift noted the pad elevation is basically the same as the Rosepointe ouses. Commissioner Mahern expressed concern that when a person is drivi g down Sycamore Road that it would look like a row of massive houses. ..- Planning Commission Minutes September 23, 1992 Page l4