PC 09/23/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

pay for right-of-way from two adjacent neighbors to the east and to improvements beyond the limits of the project. He concluded by r 14 be deleted. y $45,000 for uesting that Condition In response to Commissioner Michelotti's question, Mr. Swift revie Alexander's comments. Commissioner Michelotti expressed concern that the homes planned or the sites may be very large homes that will overlook other homes and invade their privacy She was very concerned that Lots 1, 2, and 3 would overlook the houses in the R sepointe subdivision, as far as the mass and size of house is concerned. She discussed Lot 4 with Mr. Lavey and Mr. Alexander. Mr. Swift clarified for the Commission that this is a PUD in the ful est sense and this is the only time it will come before the Planning Commission. Furthermo e, the Design Review Board has already seen the development plan and will not see it ag n. Ron Theile, architect for the project, also represented the applicatio . He explained to the Commission that the south elevation is the back of the house and th t the north elevation had been mislabeled. This has been noted at the Design Review Board vel. ~ Chairman Hovingh stated he had some problems with Lot 3.b. and e back of the garage and west elevation. He thought it appeared to be too much of a thr -sided treatment. He was also concerned about the west elevation of Lot 4.b. Commissioner Wright had some concerns about the roof coming ou over the back door of the garage on Lot 4.b. He further discussed Lot 4.a. with Mr. The Ie. Some discussion ensued as to whether the Commission had the mos current drawings. Chairman Hovingh recommended that the case be continued for tw weeks so that they could see the most current plan, as it would not come before them again; Commissioners Michelotti and Wright agreed with that comment; the applicant was not in favor of this. After further discussion it was concluded that the large blueprints re the most recent plan and that it could be taken care of tonight. Mr. Theile noted that th blueprints they are reviewing at this point are also what the Design Review Board has ooked at. The Commission further discussed the roof lines and pad elevation ith Mr. Swift. Mr. Swift noted the pad elevation is basically the same as the Rosepoin houses. Commissioner Mahern expressed concern that when a person is dri ing down Sycamore . Road that it would look like a row of massive houses. ~ Planning Commissiou Minutes September 23, 1992 Page 14