PC 08/26/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chairman Hovingh expressed concern that the Commission does ot have adequate time to review information that is presented to them the night of a meetin . In particular, he was disturbed when the developer might come up with a new plan tha even staff has not had time to review, as in the previous meeting of two weeks ago. He felt is was unfair to staff and to the Commission. He felt that when and if this happened again at the Commission should continue the project until the following meeting. The Commission generally agreed with Chairman Hovingh's com Commissioner Wright felt that it may be all right to accept minor changes brought by the applicant, but not on a major level, such as traffic issues. Commissioner Mahern commented that she has long been in favo of delaying a project if the Commission could not receive the full report by Friday evening. Commissioner Michelotti felt that the Commission is becoming pressured, especially in the rush to beat the growth management Chairman Hovingh suggested that should a developer bring a ne plan or if the Commission felt they did not have time to review information they had receiv ,that public testimony could be taken and the decision could then be continued to the ne t meeting. This would be told to the public before the application is reviewed. ~ Mr. Swift advised that staff has no problem with continuing a pr 'ect for two weeks. Some discussion ensued regarding a time limit on meetings, and at they should not go past midnight. COMMUNICATIONS There were none. REFERRALS There were none. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S INFORMATION There were none. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 9:26 p.m. b Chairman Hovingh. RespectfuJ}Y SUb~i~tted. ... /;J--IA4-P... ..,:~ /, h BRIAN SWIFT, SECRETARY Planning Commission Minutes August 26, 1992 Page 13