PC 08/12/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ favor 122 units and did not think the difference was great; howeve , they would accept the 98 units if that is what is approved. The second access street was also displayed on the map, noting tha it will cost in the neighborhood of $2 million to put in an access street. The access treet does sever the golf course and creates a barrier. The applicant is not in favor of the a cess road as the project is meant to be a secured area; with the access road going through the golf course that may not be possible. Mr. Fairfield further discussed the matter of the acce s road, noting that he does not support staff's recommendation for a second access. He roposed that an emergency road be provided, noting that even Castlewood has only one access. Mr. Fairfield stated that they would like for the park to remain a p 'vate park, whereas staff's recommendation is for a public park. He felt a public park ould have to access from Hearst Drive, which could create problems for Red Feather Drive esidents. He would favor a private park, but in turn, the applicant could provide funds for th City to install a public park at a better location. Mr. Fairfield stated that if they must convert to 98 lots, the applic t has decided Concept E (the golf course plan) is the most appropriate plan, whereas staff is recommending Plan D. ~ Mr. Fairfield further discussed traffic issues, noting that a traffic r ort was done by TJKM. He suggested that Scheme 5 might be the best approach. He furth pointed out the "haul" road which would be used only during construction phases, and wo Id be obsolete after the golf course and homes are built. Mr. Fairfield then reviewed the applicant's revised Exhibit B. He elt that other than Condition 8 they were basically satisfied with the Conditions of Ap roval. He addressed Condition 8 and said he would like to delete the entir.e condition re ting to the second public access road. If that was not acceptable, he would at least like to d lete that part stating that even if after they set aside a portion of the road on their property, e City decides that the applicant must build the rest of it. He felt that was mainly a clarifi ation issue. Commissioner Mahern and Commissioner Michelotti discussed wit location of the 5-acre park. Mr. Fairfield noted that he feels the residents because of traffic issues. Mr. Fairfield the k should be restricted to Commissioner Michelotti stated she saw a possible conflict between a private park and a public park in the area chosen for a park. Mr. Fairfield noted he i trying to avoid making any problems for the existing residents and felt that they must be c eful not to do so. He felt that if a trail system is installed, there should be a small stagin area for people to park which could serve as the trail head. ting that she could ea. She suggested that Commissioner Mahern discussed traffic issues with Mr. Fairfield, visualize some traffic problems connected with a public park in the a small park might be appropriate near the golf clubhouse. ~ Planning Commission Minutes August 12, 1992 Page 4