Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Swift stated that staff is satisfied with the "Y" connection as it i , but is not opposed to <br />a different setup if it were more foolproof. He noted that the "Y" easily take care of <br />how much water goes in either direction. He felt the Commission uld put the matter into a <br />better perspective by remembering that at the time the PUD was up or approval that nothing <br />was thought to be of better use for the stream nor was it discussed. Staff feels this is an <br />Open Space use as long as it is kept in a low-key category as propo . He noted that a <br />small tank is being used; fish and wildlife are assured adequate wate ; and the Fish and <br />Game Department have no complaints with the situation. He indicat Mr. Joel is within his <br />rights to divert the water as is being done. <br /> <br />A motion was made and amended by Comml"~\oner Wright, sec nded by Comml..~ioner <br />McGuirk, determining that the proposed use is cousistent with t e designated open <br />space use approved for this area with PUD-89-13, as long as the riteria as listed in the <br />staff report are adhered to and accepting Option 1 of the staff ort. <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners McGuirk, Wright, and Chairman Hov' <br />Commissioner Mahern <br />Commissioner Michelotti <br />None <br /> <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-62 was entered and adopted recommending ap roval of the proposed <br />use for PUD-89-13 as motioned. <br /> <br />MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br /> <br />There were none. <br /> <br />MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br /> <br />A. Future Planning Calendar <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />B. Actions of the City Council <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />C. Actions of the Design Review Board <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />July 8, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 19 <br />