My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 07/08/1992
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC 07/08/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:26:11 PM
Creation date
5/25/2005 3:02:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/8/1992
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 07/08/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Mahern, McGuirk, Wright, and Chai an Hovingh <br />None <br />Commissioner Michelotti <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-59 was entered and adopted approving Case -91-10 as motioned. <br /> <br />NEW BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />UP-92-28. Western Collel!e of Travel Careers. Inc. <br />Application for a conditional use permit to operate a travel ca <br />Stoneridge Mall, Suite 370. Zoning for the property is CoR (p) <br />Peripheral Area). <br /> <br />r school at 5700 <br />egional Commercial - <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Cas UP-92-28 subject to the <br />conditions of the staff report. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright expressed concern that the cost of condition' g the applicant to put in <br />a sidewalk might jeopardize the possibility of the school continuing in its present location. <br />He asked staff whether lack of compliance with that condition woul void the use permit. <br />~ Mr. Swift stated that the applicant is not in favor of installing the s dewalk; he further noted <br />that lack of compliance would make the use permit null and void. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright stated that he did not think a sidewalk in tha area is necessary, and <br />did not think it fair to impose that condition on the applicant at this time. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh questioned staff as to the relation of the existin berm, trees and a <br />potential sidewalk. He wondered whether the bermed area could ssibly be used to install a <br />sidewalk. Mr. Swift stated staff would have to re-evaluate that pos ibility, as they have to in <br />other areas. He noted staff would not particularly want to destroy e existing berm for the <br />addition of a sidewalk, and would need to discuss this further with taff. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mahern questioned Mr. Swift regarding the need fo <br />Mr. Swift noted people do need to walk in that area and jaywalkin <br />recommended, nor is trampling through the landscape. Parking lot <br />from each other so people cannot just go from one lot to another; <br />either in the street or through the landscaping. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />July 8, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br /> <br /> <br />a sidewalk in that area. <br />is not encouraged or <br />are not linked across <br />nce, people must walk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.