My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/10/1992
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC 06/10/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2013 3:44:16 PM
Creation date
5/25/2005 2:54:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/10/1992
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/10/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r- <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Case Tentative Tract Map <br />5721 subject to the conditions of the staff report. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner McGuirk's question, Mr. Swift replied that until the City <br />decides to accept the easement property, it remains private property. When the City accepts <br />the easement, they would then construct a trail and maintain it along with the easement. <br />They would also indemnify and hold harmless the owners' associati from public use of the <br />trail. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh noted that they are seeing a number of tentative ap extensions. He did <br />not want to deal with it tonight without a staff report, but wondered hether staff would <br />allow quid pro quos and modify the PUD conditions in exchange fo doing the tentative map. <br />Mr. Beougher replied that as he read the statutes, he saw no way th t could be done. It is <br />not a discretionary permission. The statute simply says an extensio can be granted. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Scott D. Shaull, 2001 Winword Way, San Mateo, represented West rook Housing Group. <br />As stated in their previous appearances, they have no objection to y of the conditions. <br /> <br />Mr. Shaull thought that the major items that were of concern in D <br />recreation facility, streets, concrete, and landscaping of retention b ins. The recreation <br />center has been completed and is being used by the association at th s point in time. There <br />are some other items that have not been taken care of yet, but the a plicant is attempting to <br />do so. He thought that staff was pleased with their progress at this int. <br /> <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh referred to Condition 3 in regard to grading pe its and/or building <br />permits and that they shall not be issued until all improvements in T cts 5721 and 5825 are <br />~ completed. He questioned Mr. Shaull as to the status of this. <br /> <br />Larry Snyder, 1375 Bordeaux Street, represented the Kottinger Ran h Home Association as <br />president. He said back in December of 1991 they were concerned about Conditions 5 and <br />6. When the people in the neighborhood bought their homes they d d not know there would <br />be trails going into the hills; they were also concerned about the sta ing area, which they <br />perceived would be a parking area for drug users, four-wheeling, v dalism, etc. Since that <br />time the association has met with Mr. Swift and Mr. Rasmussen an has had further follow- <br />up discussions. It appears now that the staging area has been remo ed which they are happy <br />about. In regard to the trails, they are willing to work with the Ci on that and foresee no <br />problems at this point. <br /> <br />In response to Mr. Snyder's question, Mr. Swift replied that in this particular case 300 ft. is <br />all that is needed for a trail easement. Staff does not want the trail 0 go anywhere near the <br />houses or Kottinger Ranch subdivision any more than the homeown rs do. <br /> <br />-- Plannm, COmmi..iOR Minute8 <br />June 10, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.