PC 05/13/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

r- the public for their feeling that the City is misleading them. He wo ld recommend keeping the plan as it was previously sent to Council. Chairman Mahem stated she could see why the Greenes wish to c and said she had been prepared to support Medium Density until sh comments. She agreed with those who felt they had a plan after tw was not fair to change it. She agreed with Commissioners McG . office use with landscaping would serve as a buffer as well as or b it stands now, she could not support a change to Medium Density empathy for the Greenes, but felt if they made a change for them, other changes for other people and then they would be back where ge to Medium Density, heard the public hearing years work and felt it and Michelotti that r than soundwalls. As sidential. She felt ey would have to make ey started. Commissioner Hovingh stated he could not go along with a change Medium Density Residential. He thought Ms. Gray had a reasonable request for M ium Density if other people receive Medium Density, but he could not support a change. He is also concerned about the road width which appears to be 52 ft., and the interior str ts further down have 56 ft. For a Medium Density neighborhood, he felt there should be si ewalks on both sides of the street and standard curbs. He also felt that the Office designati on Sunol Boulevard offered a reasonable sound barrier. He thought the original plan w s more appropriate than the one now suggested. Commissioner Wright agreed with the rest of the Commissioners. e supported the original plan. ~ Commissioner Horan stated for the record that he would favor goin the Greenes and the Bachs; however, he is against the density chan properties. He was also concerned about the decision on what to d property . to Medium Density for on the balance of the with the school district Commissioner Hovingh said he felt the removal of San Antonio Str t and Independence Drive are a mistake. He further stated he is in favor of increasing e right-of-way on the western portion of the Collector road back to 60 ft.; he favored req iring Medium Density lots, if approved, to be "front-end loaded" along the houses facing e East-West Collector and also for the Low Density houses. A motion was made by Commi<<~ioner Michelotti, seconded by C mmi<<~ioner McGuirk o Recommending denial oC the proposed General Pla redesignation oC Medium Density Residential Cor Parcels 1, 4, 5, 6, ,8 and 9 Cor Case GP- 91-7/SP-88-6, North Sycamore Plan; and o Recommending denial oC the proposed Specific Pla redesignation oC PUD- MDR Cor Parcels 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 Cor Case G -91-7/SP-88-6, North Sycamore Plan. Minules Planning Commission May 13, 1992 Page 12