My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 04/22/1992
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC 04/22/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:25:27 PM
Creation date
5/25/2005 2:09:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/22/1992
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 04/22/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Martin Inderbitzen stated that he feels the resolution reads like a s tement of findings and <br />facts after much deliberation, but he feels deliberation has not tak place at any level. He <br />said he has no suggestions for changes. He noted that the materi prepared by opponents of <br />Measure K is reflective of the "Whereas" in the Planning Commis 'on resolution. <br /> <br /> <br />the Plan by the Planning <br />ttee. He provided input <br /> <br />Richard Dobbs stated that he doesn't feel he has a right to comme t, as the resolution should <br />reflect the Planning Commission's feelings on the Plan. <br /> <br />Paul Corrado stated that he feels because there wasn't ownership <br />Commission, the Commission is voting against the citizens' com <br />regarding specific areas of the resolution. <br /> <br />Terry Spraggins reminded the Planning Commission of the Com ttee's composition, noting <br />that the majority of the citizens on the Committee were against th Plan. She stated that she <br />feels the Planning Commission is looking at what is best for the 'ty of Pleasanton and that <br />the Planning Commission should adopt the resolution as is. <br /> <br /> <br />Karen Wilson stated that she objected to the previous speakers inn endos that the position of <br />the Planning Commission is only political and not one of a planni g aspect. <br /> <br />David Glenn stated that he does not identify any specific errors in the resolution and <br />commended the Planning Commission for what they have done. <br /> <br />r Mayonne Garrity, 1870 Tanglewood, stated that the citizens' com ittee was not <br />representative of Pleasanton residents. She further stated that it i the Planning <br />Commissions' obligation to oppose the Plan by adopting the resol tion. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the accuracy of each clau as interpreted by <br />individual members of the Planning Commission and as each cia se relates to specific <br />policies of the Plan. During the discussion Commissioner Horan advised that he feels the <br />statements made in the resolution are not factual. Chairman M stated that she feels <br />they are factual. Commissioner Wright advised that he agreed w th Commissioner Horan <br />and that he feels the resolution is politically incorrect and that it's a matter of interpretation <br />of facts. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan stated that he felt each "Whereas" clause n <br />revised as necessary with regard to accuracy. <br /> <br />Chairman Mahem reminded the Commission that each member d an opportunity a month <br />ago to come up with a simple statement. <br /> <br />Minute, Planning CoouniaIion <br />April 22, 1992 <br /> <br />Pag. 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.