Laserfiche WebLink
<br />property as a temporary access through the Chu's at their cost. Th t is rarely done, but has <br />occurred and is very expensive and burdensome. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Michelotti, amended by Co missioner Michelotti and <br />seconded by Commissioner Wright finding that the proposed rezoni g to the PUD - MDR <br />district is consistent with the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan and th Pleasanton General Plan; <br />making the PUD findings for the proposed development plan as lis in the staff report; and <br />adopting a resolution recommending approval of Case PUD-91-15, ubject to the conditions <br />listed in Exhibit B, with the following modifications: <br /> <br />o Modifying Condition 6.a. to include stucco; <br /> <br />o Modifying Condition 12.b. to be consistent with the toneridge Orchards <br />project; and <br /> <br />o Modifying Condition 14 to be reworded to reflect th whatever is done is <br />looked at in the Tentative Map Stage and that this be only an emergency <br />access. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Horan, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wright and c;,hairman Mahem <br />None <br />Commissioner Hovingh <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-17 was entered and adopted recommending <br />15 as motioned. <br /> <br />MA TIERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br /> <br />A. Future Planning Calendar <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />B. Actions of the City Councll <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />C. Actions of the Design Review Board <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />D. Actions of the Zoning Adm;ni~tor. <br /> <br />No action required. <br /> <br />Minutes Planning Commi.aion <br />Special Meeting of February 20, 1992 <br /> <br />Pase 9 <br /> <br />roval of Case PUD-91- <br />