My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/20/1992
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC 02/20/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:24:38 PM
Creation date
5/25/2005 1:53:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/20/1992
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 02/20/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />At the request of Commissioner Michelotti, Mr. Swift reiterated th <br />a maximum of 54 lots be allowed and that the project be consistent <br />guidelines. <br /> <br />the motion included that <br />'th the WFRCOD <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Michelotti, seconded by Co missioner Wright, (1) <br />finding that the proposed PUD zoning is consistent with the Gene Plan; (2) finding that the <br />PUD findings as listed in the staff report can be made; and (3) ad ting a resolution <br />recommending that the City Council approve PUD-89-17, requiring the project to be no more <br />then 54 lots, with Foothill Road minimum setbacks as recommend by staff and subject to <br />the conditions listed in Exhibit B. <br /> <br /> <br />COD guidelines, as <br />She did not want to see <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern said she could support some flexibility in the <br />long as they see some diversity and opened up the area of concern. <br />a big looped area, but would favor something more of a cul-de-sac <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Michelotti, Wright and Chairman M em <br />Commissioners Horan and McGuirk <br />Commissioner Hovingh <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-16 was entered and adopted recommending <br />17 as motioned. <br /> <br />roval of Case PUD-89- <br /> <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern said she really did not have a problem with reI ing the setbacks to 120 <br />feet; however, she would like some variations in the plan. <br /> <br />PUD-91-1S. west View Prouerties. Ltd. (Louis G.Baldaccil <br />Application for rezoning to the PUD (planned Unit Developmen ) - MDR (Medium <br />Density Residential) District and development plan approval to ow the construction of <br />46 paired single-family homes and two detached single-family h mes proposed for an <br />approximately 7.O-acre site located southeast of the Stonericlge rive and Stone Point <br />Way intersection. Zoning is PUD (Planned Unit Development) MDR (Medium Density <br />Residential) and HDR (High Density Residential) Districts. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Ca PUD-91-15 subject to <br />the conditions of the staff report. He added that staff is suggesting the joint street should be <br />a stubbed street, but that this can be taken care of at the Tentative ap stage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan asked staff if they prefer the design that Mr. 'st favored. Mr, Swift <br />agreed that they do prefer this design. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright requested that staff be sure to allow two sses for the project. Mr. <br />Swift again replied that this could be taken care of at the tentative ap stage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti discussed the lot sizes on Trenery Drive <br /> <br />Minutes Planning Commillion <br />Special Meetina of Febnwy 20, 1992 <br /> <br />Pa" 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.