My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-92-98
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC-92-98
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:34:00 AM
Creation date
5/4/2005 4:47:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/30/1992
DOCUMENT NO
PC-92-98
DOCUMENT NAME
VTTM 6545
NOTES
KAUFMAN AND BROAD
NOTES 3
SUBD. INTO 108 SF LOTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALJ:FORNJ:A <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-92-98 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6545, THE <br />APPLICATION OF KAUFMAN AND BROAD <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Kaufman and Broad has applied for a vesting tentative map <br />to allow the subdivision of an approximately 17 acre <br />parcel into 108 single-family residerltial lots and for <br />remainder parcels consisting of roadways and park area <br />located at 3801 stanley Boulevard; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) <br />_ MDR (Medium Density Residential) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing of November 30, <br />1992, the planning Commission considered all public <br />testimony, relevant exhibits and recommendations of the <br />city staff concerning this application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the environmental issues related to this project were <br />addressed in a Negative Declaration which was prepared <br />for PUD-91-17 and adopted by the city council in April <br />1992. The proposed tentative subdivision map is <br />consistent with the approved PUD development plan; <br />therefore, no additional environmental review or <br />documentation is necessary; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the planning commission made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The proposed map is consistent with the General <br />Plan. <br /> <br />At a density of 6.35 DU/AC, this 108 unit <br />residential SUbdivision lies within the 2 to 8 <br />du/gross acre acceptable range of the site's <br />General Plan Land Use Element "Medium Density <br />Residential" designation (maximum of 136 units). <br />The PUD development plan was found to be consistent <br />with all policies of the General Plan, and this <br />tentative tract map conforms to that development <br />plan. The changes also conform to the city's noise <br />standards (rear wall height reduction to 10') and <br />to the city's traffic standards (right-in and <br />right-out driveway.) Therefore, the proposed <br />tentative map is consistent with the city's General <br />Plan. <br /> <br />2. The site is physically suitable for this type of <br />development and density. <br /> <br />II . I . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.