My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-92-67
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC-92-67
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:57 AM
Creation date
5/4/2005 2:46:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/22/1992
DOCUMENT NO
PC-92-67
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-91-13
NOTES
CHANG SU-O LIN
NOTES 3
122 SFH /GOLF COURSE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />JI <br /> <br />The proposed project is technically consistent with <br />General Plan standards for density as proposed (122 <br />units) if the 5 suites proposed for the golf course <br />(which staff believes should be considered as a <br />single dwelling unit) are not included. However, <br />the total number of units on the property should <br />not exceed 98, clearly within the density standards <br />for the "Rural Density Residential [RDR)" site. <br />The city's General Plan holding capacity for <br />population, traffic, and other factors was based on <br />an assumption of 98 housing units on the subject <br />site. However, the General Plan assumes that the <br />"mid-range" assumptions for development may be <br />exceeded (e.g. additional, incremental traffic from <br />the proposed golf course) inasmuch as some <br />properties in the City will develop at less than <br />"mid-range" density assumptions. In addition to <br />housing uses, the General Plan allows recreational <br />and community facilities, such as the proposed golf <br />course, in areas designated for residential <br />development. The EIR indicates potential <br />inconsistencies with the city's heritage tree and <br />stream channel policies with the project as <br />proposed. However, recommended project conditions <br />reduce tree loss and stream channel impacts to a <br />degree which staff believes may be found to be in <br />conformance with the intent of the General Plan. <br />As conditioned, the project would remain consistent <br />with General Plan policies relative to traffic and <br />circulation. The provision of neighborhood park <br />amenities would render the project consistent with <br />General Plan policies pertaining to parks and <br />recreation. The dedication of natural open space <br />is consistent with the General Plan goal of <br />achieving a regional trail system in southeast <br />Pleasanton. A detailed review of the pertinent <br />General Plan policies is found in Table 3-2 of the <br />EIR. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />The plan is compatible with previously <br />properties in the vicinity and the <br />topographic features of the site: <br /> <br />As noted in the EIR, the vicinity of the proposed <br />development is characterized by low density <br />development (interspersed with natural open space) <br />to the north and west and undeveloped, rugged <br />terrain to the east and south. The proposed rural <br />density development would maintain open space <br />(either natural or golf course) adjacent to <br />neighboring properties. The residential lots would <br />be clustered near the center of the site and would <br />be insulated from adjacent properties by large <br />areas of open space. The physical improvements to <br /> <br />developed <br />natural, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.