Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-93-23 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />FOR THE APPLICATION OF PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY FOR A <br />MAJOR MODIFICATJ:ON AS FILED UNDER CASE PUD-81-30-27M/ <br />PUD-85-8-9M <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Prudential Insurance Company has applied for a major <br />modification to the governing Hacienda Business Park <br />PUD's to: 1) modify the site development standards <br />contained within Table B-1 of the Park's Design <br />Guidelines to increase the flexibility of the building <br />type constructed on any lot and to reduce the off-street <br />parking requirement; 2) change the land use designation <br />for about 130 acres to allow either office or commercial <br />uses; 3) change certain conditions of Ordinance No. 1325 <br />to modify the traffic requirements for future development <br />proposals; and 4) modify the existing development <br />agreement to provide for the proposed changes, reserve <br />sewage capacity, and provide for other infrastructure. <br />The proposed project would involve 30 separate lots <br />located within the Hacienda Business Park; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />at its meeting of May 12, 1993, <br />received a proposed negative <br />PUD-81-30-27M/PUD-85-8-9M; and <br /> <br />the Planning commission <br />declaration for Case <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning commission has received and reviewed the <br />Initial study dated March 19, 1993, and received the <br />recommendations of the staff; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held at which time the <br />public was given the opportunity to comment on the <br />environmental impacts of the proposal; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning commission has reviewed the potential <br />impacts in accordance with the applicable state and local <br />guidelines governing the preparation of Negative <br />Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the Planning commission finds <br />proposed project would not have <br />effects on the environment; and <br /> <br />that approval of the <br />any significant adverse <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning commission further finds that the proposed <br />project would not have any adverse impacts on the site's <br />wildlife. <br />