My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-92-45
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC-92-45
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:55 AM
Creation date
4/20/2005 4:46:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/27/1992
DOCUMENT NO
PC-92-45
DOCUMENT NAME
GP-91-03 PUD-91-03
NOTES
MARSH/SMITH ASSOCIATES/CASTLEWOOD HEIGHTS
NOTES 3
29 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />14. Prior to the start of grading operations, the topsoil on the <br />site shall be stocked piled and after grading is completed, <br />shall be distributed evenly over all planting areas. <br /> <br />15. A generalized color board to provide guidance in the selection <br />of house and roof colors shall be submitted to the Design <br />Review Board in conjunction with the final landscape plans. <br />In general, the principal colors should represent medium to <br />dark earth tones. <br /> <br />16. The creek are shall be dedicated to the City in conjunction <br />with any Final Map application. The Tentative Map application <br />shall specifically show this area which is generally depicted <br />as the shaded area on the proposed Landscape Plan. <br /> <br />17. Cul-De-Sac #3 shall be modified so that there is positive <br />drainage release. This detail shall be shown on the Tentative <br />Map. <br /> <br />18. <br /> <br />This development shall be of no further validity and <br />applicant shall be required to submit the same or <br />development plan for city approval prior to development of <br />site in the event that any of the following occur: . <br /> <br />a. The applicant fails to receive growth management approval <br />within 2 1/2 years of PUD approval; or <br /> <br />the <br />new <br />the <br /> <br />b. Subsequent to such approval, the applicant allows the <br />growth management approval to lapse; or <br /> <br />c. If exempt from growth management, the applicant fails to <br />record a final map within two years of PUD approval. <br /> <br />19. The developer acknowledges that the City of Pleasanton does <br />not guarantee the availability of sufficient sewer capacity to <br />serve this development by the approval of this case, and that <br />the developer agrees and acknowledges that building permit <br />approval may be withheld if sewer capacity is found by the <br />City not to be available. <br /> <br />20. This approval does not guarantee the availability of <br />sufficient water to serve the project. The city shall <br />withhold building permits for the project if at the time <br />building permits are applied for, mandatory water rationing is <br />in effect, unless the city has adopted a water offset program <br />and unless the developer is participating in the program. <br />Notwithstanding the developer's participation in such a <br />program, the City may withhold building permits if the city <br />determines that sufficient water is not available at the time <br />of application of building permits. <br /> <br />Page 18 of 19 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.