Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5-2 vegetation/Landscape Plan (Draft EIR, page 5-13). Said <br />mitigation measures were considered and adopted with any <br />pertinent changes in condition 5-2(A - G), Exhibit "B" of the <br />Planning commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. <br /> <br />5-3 Refined Grading Plan (Draft EIR, page 5-14). Said mitigation <br />measures were considered and adopted with any pertinent <br />changes in condition 5-3(A - E), Exhibit "B" of the planning <br />commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. <br /> <br />5-4 Sound Wall Plan (Draft EIR, page 5-14). Said mitigation <br />measures were considered and adopted with any pertinent <br />changes in Condition 5-4, Exhibit "B" of the planning <br />commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. <br /> <br />5-5 <br /> <br />Light and Glare Control (Draft EIR, 5-14 and 5-15). <br />mitigation measures were considered and adopted with <br />pertinent changes in condition 5-5, Exhibit "B" of <br />planning commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. <br /> <br />5-6 Barrier Along East property Line (Draft EIR, page 5-15). Said <br />mitigation measures were considered and adopted with any <br />pertinent changes in condition 5-6, Exhibit "B" of the <br />planning commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. <br /> <br />said <br />any <br />the <br /> <br />Finding: Mitigation Measures 5-1 through 5-6 Feasible and Required <br /> <br />The city finds that it is feasible to mitigate this impact to a <br />less-than-significant level by requiring the applicant and <br />successors in interest to incorporate the specific provisions of <br />Mitigation Measures 5-1 through 5-6 into the project design. The <br />applicant and successors in interest shall incorporate such <br />landscape alteration reduction provisions into project design, as <br />a "Condition of Approval" to the project. <br /> <br />Grading <br /> <br />Impact: Exposed cut and fill slopes in visually-sensitive areas <br /> <br />The city finds that approval of the project as currently proposed <br />would change landformS and create exposed cut slopes and fill banks <br />in visually sensitive areas. This is a significant impact (Draft <br />EIR, page 5-8). <br /> <br />proposed Mitigation Measures of the EIR <br /> <br />The EIR identified the following mitigation measures which would <br />sUbstantially avoid this impact. <br /> <br />5-2 vegetation/Landscape Plan (Draft EIR, page 5-13). said <br />mitigation measures were considered and adopted with any <br />pertinent changes in Condition 5-2(A - G), Exhibit "B" of the <br />planning commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />II I i . I <br />