Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING COHHISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-92-26 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS <br />FILED UNDER CASE PUD-89-14-1D, THE APPLICATION OF CRAIG <br />SJOBERG <br /> <br />WHEREAS, craig Sjoberg has applied for a PUD development plan <br />approval to construct an approximately 20,110 sq. ft. <br />office building on an approximately 1.13 acre site <br />located at 4900 Pleasanton Avenue; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD (Planned unit Development) <br />- Office District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />at their duly noticed hearing of March 25, <br />Planning commission considered all pUblic <br />relevant exhibits and recommendations of the <br />concerning this application; and <br /> <br />1992, the <br />testimony, <br />City staff <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was <br />prepared in conjunction with the original PUD approval. <br />The proposed project is within the scope of this <br />environmental report; therefore, no additional <br />environmental document was prepared for this project; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning commission made the following PUD findings: <br /> <br />1. The plan is in the best interests of the public <br />health, safety, and general welfare: <br /> <br />The proposed project would be consistent with all <br />applicable City standards concerning public health, <br />safety, and welfare. The development will be <br />designed to meet all applicable Building and Fire <br />Codes. <br /> <br />2. The plan is consistent with the City'S General <br />Plan: <br /> <br />The proposed office development would be consistent <br />with the requirements of the applicable commercial <br />and Offices (Retail, Highway and Service <br />Commercial; Business and Professional Offices) <br />General Plan designation. The proposed F.A.R. is <br />within the .60 F.A.R. limit. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />The plan is compatible with previously <br />properties in the vicinity and the <br />topographic features of the site: <br /> <br />developed <br />natural, <br />