PC-95-87 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. PC-95-87 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF STEVEN SLIPKA FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A SECONDARY UNIT AS FILED UNDER CASE UP-95-51 WHEREAS, Steven Slipka has applied for a conditional use permit to establish a secondary unit within a single-family home located at 4074 Suffolk Way; and WHEREAS, zoning for the property is R-I-6,500 (single-family residential) District; and WHEREAS, at their duly noticed public hearing of November 8, 1995, the Planning Commission considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits and recommendations of the City staff concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed staff's findings as stated in the Staff Report prepared for Case UP-95-51, dated November 8, 1995, and made the following findings: A. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. The primary objective of Chapter 18.04 of the Municipal Code, "General Provisions," is to protect and promote the public health, safety, peace, comfort, convenience, prosperity and general welfare. In addition, objectives of the R-l residential district include achieving appropriately located areas for family living at reasonable population densities consistent with sound standards of public health and safety, minimizing traffic congestion, and providing sufficient parking. The City of Pleasanton has not adopted an ordinance which regulates secondary units, therefore, secondary units are subject to the provisions of state law. Consistent with this law, a conditional use permit must be approved to establish a secondary unit in the City of Pleasanton. The subject use permit meets the State requirements which specify guidelines that act as maximum requirements for communities to use in the evaluation of secondary units. The secondary unit conforms to these requirements, will not exceed the allowable density, and is consistent with the General Plan and zoning for the lot. II .