My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/29/1995
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
PC 11/29/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 3:58:13 PM
Creation date
3/30/2005 2:43:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/29/1995
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/29/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />c. GPA-95-02/PUD-95-06. Red Bear. Inc. (Stanlev Seniors) <br />(1) Application for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate five parcels of <br />approximately 2.88 acres from Medium Density Residential to High <br />Density Residential. <br />(2) Planned Unit Development rezoning from R-1-20,000 to PUD (Planned <br />Unit Development) - HDR (High Density Residential) District and <br />development plan approval for a 97-unit, two-story apartment complex for <br />reduced-income senior citizens located at 4023-4073 Stanley Boulevard. <br />Zoning for the property is R-1-20,000 District. <br />The Planning Commission will also consider the Negative Declaration prepared <br />for the project. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson presented the staff report for the second hearing of the Red Bear senior housing <br />project. Mr. Iserson noted some neighbors were not notified of the October 25th public <br />hearing; therefore, the application is being heard to allow for their public testimony. The <br />neighbors not receiving the proper notification are the residents of Del Valle Court, Mr. <br />Glanville, owner of the vacant property on Del Valle Court, and the Finns at 202 Del Valle <br />Court. <br /> <br />Staff held a second neighborhood meeting and became aware of the serious concerns of these <br />neighbors. Staff determined the application should be brought before the Planning <br />Commission for a second review. The applicants have revised the site plan in accordance to <br />the neighbors' concerns. <br /> <br />Staff reviewed the existing residential development in the area as well as the viable and non- <br />viable land use designations for the site. Staff determined that the site could accommodate <br />land use designations of Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and High <br />Density Residential. <br /> <br />This project has a density of 33 units per acre which is higher density than other projects in <br />the area. However, staff distinguishes "senior" housing from a traditional high density <br />housing project as having less of an impact on schools, parks, traffic, activity, noise, etc. <br />Mr. Iserson cited the number of vehicle trips for various densities. Staff feels the streets will <br />be able to accommodate the traffic generated by the senior project. <br /> <br />Staff feels this project is consistent with the area because of the other high density <br />developments in the area. If this density level was a traditional project, it would have <br />greater impacts on the area. However, this is a senior project and staff feels the above- <br />mentioned impacts would not be present. The General Plan Steering Committee has <br />recommended that sites be made available for infill development, and that multiple family <br />residential development and affordable housing be promoted. Staff feels the proposed project <br />will meet these goals. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />November 29, 1995 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.