My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/09/1995
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
PC 08/09/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 3:57:28 PM
Creation date
3/30/2005 2:24:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/9/1995
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 08/09/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br />. <br /> <br />Staff does recommend approval of Case PUD-95-03. Mr. Plucker noted that the reference to <br />a soundwall should be deleted from Condition 15. <br /> <br />In response to CommissionerHovingh, Mr. Plucker noted that the farm house of Anita <br />Davidson would be removed. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Barker, Mr. Higdon stated that Rose Avenue's size is the <br />City's minimum street size. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />Lynn Jansen, Lynden Homes, 481 Kingswood Land, Danville, represented this application. <br />The speaker briefly described the project and the project architecture. Mr. Jansen gave an <br />overview of the discussions, meetings, etc. with Mr. Jones regarding his easement. Mr. <br />Jones had been unwilling to negotiate regarding his easement. <br /> <br />Mr. Jansen noted that they have worked closely with Zone 7 and have met their <br />requirements. Also, no driveway of the development backs out onto Rose Avenue. The <br />landscaping will coordinate with that existing in the adjacent development. The mature <br />existing trees will be incorporated as street trees in the development. Mr. Jansen discussed <br />the street layout with or without the Rose Avenue extension. The house design is that of a <br />country farmhouse with large porches across the front and back. <br /> <br />Mr. Jansen briefly gave some background regarding their discussions of the benefits of this <br />development and the easement with Mr. Jones. Mr. Jones indicated that the easement was <br />his land and nothing was going to be done to it. Mr. Jansen tried to move forward, <br />however, working with staff. At the very least, Mr. Thompson's rights included turning the <br />easement into a public street. <br /> <br />Mr. Jansen had a few conditions he wanted to discuss. <br /> <br />Condition 5: The applicant would be willing to provide Mr. Jones with a driveway to Rose <br />Avenue such that he would not have to change his address in lieu of the $1,000 <br />reimbursement requested by Mr. Jones. Mr. Jansen feels $250 is a reasonable payment for <br />Mr. Jones to change his address. <br /> <br />Condition 6: Mr. Jansen is willing to talk to Mr. Jones about the encroachment of his <br />driveway over Lot 13. Mr. Jansen feels that over time Mr. Jones' driveway shifted over <br />what is now the comer of Lot 13. He feels the staff report contends that Mr. Jones has a <br />prescriptive right to it. Mr. Jansen feels this encroachment is not needed by Mr. Jones and <br />there are no adverse conditions associated with it. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />August 9, 1995 <br /> <br />o <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.