My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/28/1995
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
PC 06/28/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 3:57:00 PM
Creation date
3/30/2005 1:55:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/28/1995
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/28/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Barker, Hovingh, McGuirk, Wright and Chairman Lutz <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC 95-38 was entered and adopted approving Case Z-95-91, as <br />motioned. <br /> <br />b. PUD-95-02. AAAAA Rent-a-Soace (Knuooe Familv) <br />Application for Planned Unit Development development plan approval to construct a <br />two-story, 108,000 square foot self-storage facility located at 5700 Pleasant Hill Road. <br />Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - C-O (Office Commercial) <br />District. The Planning Commission will also consider the Negative Declaration prepared <br />for this project. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson presented the staff report for the application for a PUD development plan <br />approval to construct a two-story, 10S,000 square foot self storage facility at 5700 Pleasant <br />Hill Road. Zoning for the property is PUD - Commercial/Office. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson advised that there have been neighborhood meetings and written communications <br />received by staff in which the neighborhood has expressed opposition to the project citing <br />property devaluation, traffic, land use compatibility, impacts to views and parks, and <br />operational issues. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson noted that there is only one approved use for this site which is for a retirement <br />hotel facility. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson described the project, noting that the building has been designed to resemble an <br />office building which includes "fake" windows, recessed first floor to allow shrubbery to be <br />planted beneath the second story, two comer plaza areas, and landscaping along the street. <br />Staff believes that, if approved, more trees need to be added for transitioning to the park, <br />and more shrubbery is necessary around the building. <br /> <br />Staff feels the setbacks are inadequate and should be increased along Stoneridge Drive and <br />Pleasant Hill Road. The City's reviewing architect has reviewed this project, with one <br />suggestion of modifying the column design already being incorporated. Line of sight studies <br />show that the existing trees would soften the look of the project from the surrounding areas, <br />however, the view of the ridge would be lost to the first floor of the Gold Creek <br />Townhomes, and partially blocked from the second floor balconies. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />June 28, 1995 <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.