My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/14/1995
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
PC 06/14/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 3:56:48 PM
Creation date
3/30/2005 1:53:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/14/1995
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/14/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Hovingh inquired of staff regarding the original conditions of Golden Eagle <br />Farms to have all open space trees in place before beginning construction. Mr. Plucker <br />stated staff has been working with the developer to get the trees installed and the issue is not <br />fully closed. Mr. Swift advised that the trees in the open area were to be to planted during <br />Phase I. Staff then amended the condition to postpone the planting until Phase II. For <br />various reasons, the trees were not planted, or were not taken care of and died, or the wrong <br />landscaping was installed, etc. Mr. Swift noted that Commissioner Hovingh was correct in <br />his thinking that the trees were not planted in the correct time frame. <br /> <br />Mr. Modjtehedi stated that the developer's architect (Mr. Jack Byars) advised the owner that <br />no analysis had been done to locate the building envelope for this lot and sees no problem <br />with moving the house 20 feet further up the lot. Mr. Modjtehedi stated the house is now in <br />line with the two existing houses on the left of this lot. Because the street in front of the lot <br />curves downward (and the lot is larger than the adjoining lot), the designer feels the house <br />should be in line with the existing neighbor so as not to impact the neighbor by having view <br />access into the neighbor's bedrooms and the neighbor having view into the applicant's <br />backyard. It is the speaker's opinion that by moving the house back, the additional landscape <br />softens and hides the front elevation. <br /> <br />Regarding the split level design, the speaker feels the split level house would cause an <br />uncomfortable living arrangement for the owners. The architects have tried to design the <br />home with the appearance of a cascading look on the outside, keeping the inside as level as <br />possible. Furthermore, they feel the garage area should be added in the calculation of the <br />overall change in elevation of the house. As for exceeding the 35 foot height, Mr. <br />Modjtehedi advised there would be no problem redesigning the house to accommodate this <br />requirement. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk inquired why Mr. Lijesen bought this particular sloped lot and is <br />now trying to design a home which does not conform to the slope of the lot. Amos Picker, <br />representing Mr. Lijesen, stated that Mr. Lijesen chose this lot because of its low visibility in <br />the tract and its natural setting. Mr. Picker also commented that the developer intimated that <br />the building envelopes were not firmed up and could be relocated. Mr. Picker also <br />commented that an earthquake fault runs along Clover Court, and feels it is wiser to move <br />the house further away from the fault rather than moving it closer. <br /> <br />Mr. Picker noted that Mr. Lijesen will probably sell his lot and locate elsewhere if this <br />application is denied. He feels Mr. Lijesen' s requests are not unreasonable and the plans <br />have been through three reviews with approvals. He further questioned why the design <br />reviews were even required before seeking approval from the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh advised staff that the culvert in question has been filled in. Staff <br />discussed their concern regarding relocating the culvert in this area. Mr. Higdon stated that <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutea <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />June t4, 1995 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.