Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chairman Wright did not have a problem with the proposed location of the building sign as <br />well as leaving the parking lot as is without requiring a variance. <br /> <br />Chairman Wright requested that Condition 7 be modified to add a pedestrian entrance in the <br />wrought iron fence located along the southern property line to facilitate pedestrian access <br />from Main Street to the back parking lot. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dove commented that he strongly advises against the two driveways on Ray <br />Street because the large delivery trucks are too large to access the parking lot and it would <br />provide safer accessibility for the handicapped and elderly walking through the parking areas. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Barker, seconded by Commissioner Hovingh, <br />rmding that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment and <br />adopting a resolution approving the attached draft Negative Declaration. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Barker, Hovingh, Lutz, McGuirk, and Chairman Wright <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Barker, seconded by Commissioner Lutz, finding <br />that the project has a De Minimis impact on the site's wildlife. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Barker, Hovingh, Lutz, McGuirk, and Chairman Wright <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-95-28 was entered approving the Negative Declaration for Case <br />Z-95-12, as motioned. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh stated he did not support this application because of the numerous <br />violations of the Downtown Specific Plan and Design Guidelines. He believes approving this <br />application will take away the Commission's ability to enforce these guidelines in the future. <br />He felt that this project violated more policies, guidelines, and Code requirements than any <br />other project proposed in Pleasanton. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Barker, seconded by Commissioner Lutz, <br />approving Case Z-95-12 subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit B, with the following <br />modifications: <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />May 24, 1995 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />