PC 04/12/1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

She also spoke of LAFCO's process. She understands that Pleasanton will have to submit a plan for services within the annexed area, including defining the services, identifying the level and range of services, when these services could be extended, upgrading of roads, utilities, as well as how the services would be financed. Ms. Ambrose advised the SPWD would be very interested in seeing this plan. Ms. Ambrose felt this area of the Draft EIR was too vague. PUBLIC HEARING WAS CWSED Commissioner Hovingh had a few questions for staff: Pg. 151 -- air quality data from 1990 to 1994 from Livermore. Commissioner Hovingh asked if air quality readings were taken in Pleasanton, and why Pleasanton's readings were not reported. Mr. Swift stated the readings from Pleasanton do not include ozone readings. Ozone readings are reported from the Livermore station. Pg. 191 -- fire department. Does Pleasanton have a chemical specialist employed by the City? Mr. Swift advised that currently this person is hired under contract. Appendix C -- location of receptors for K-Line-4 modeling. What are the height of these receptors? Mr. Swift will have to investigate. Appendix J -- potential of reverse osmosis plants and problem of disposal of biosolids and brine. Commissioner Hovingh asked if these issues were not part of any type of water processing. Mr. Swift noted that in reverse osmosis processes, the byproducts are so concentrated with salts, they cannot be disposed of in the tidal portions of the San Francisco Bay. Page 6 -- residents of the SFWD property would be able to participate in City activities only by paying higher fees. Commissioner Hovingh inquired if the residents in outlying areas (e.g., Vineyard) cannot put their youngsters in Little League, etc. Mr. Swift was unsure of how the children's programs are handled, but he noted the adults from these areas pay a nonresident fee. Commissioner Dove inquired of staff if "build-out" is as discussed in the '86 plan, not what is contemplated in the present General Plan Review. Mr. Swift advised he was correct. Chairman Wright commended staff for their report covering many densities. Commissioner Lutz believes the report is excellent. Commissioner Barker stated she was on the Circulation Review Committee, and they were very concerned about the impact of traffic in this area. She believes their concerns will come across in the Circulation Committee's final report. Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 April 12, 1995