My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 01/11/1995
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
PC 01/11/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2017 3:55:20 PM
Creation date
3/30/2005 1:31:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/11/1995
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 01/11/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Barker inquired if the number could remain at eight but would include stand- <br />alone ATM's. <br /> <br />Chairman Wright commented that he likes the idea of the market determining the number of <br />banks downtown, although he would not like to see all of the banks leave the Downtown <br />area. He believes it is an amenity to have a number of banks in the Downtown area. He <br />will follow staff's recommendation of four banks required Downtown. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lutz does not feel this is a market driven item. He believes there may be a <br />loss to Pleasanton because a bank may not want to open up a facility downtown, and citizens <br />who do not work downtown may be losing a convenient bank located in their neighborhood <br />shopping center. Because the downtown is now functioning, Commissioner Lutz feels the <br />policy should be suspended. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift noted that both the Downtown Association and the Chamber of Commerce <br />reviewed the policy. The Downtown Association recommended to reduce the number of <br />banks to four and the Chamber of Commerce recommended to eliminate the policy. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk inquired why have such an ordinance if it can't be regulated. Mr. <br />Swift advised that the City has been enforcing the bank ordinance by disallowing a bank <br />branch to be sold to a different entity, as well as through conditions of approval placed on <br />new banks. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Barker, seconded by Chairman Wright, <br />approving Case RZ-94-8 by adopting a resolution recommending (1) elimination of the <br />existing Financial Institution Policy (City Council Resolution 87-541) and (2) approval of <br />the draft amendments to the Pleasanton Municipal Code and Downtown Specific Plan, <br />attached as Exhibit A, and forwarding the draft amendments to the City Council for <br />review, with the following modification to Exhibit A: <br /> <br />18.08.092: "Financial Institution" includes those businesses engaged in deposit <br />banking or closely related functions, and shall include but shall not be limited to <br />the following types of businesses: banks and savings and loan associations. <br />Credit unions, mortgage bankers and brokers, loan companies and other non- <br />depository institutions shall not be considered a financial institution for purposes <br />of this Code. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioner Barker and Chairman Wright <br />NOES: Commissioners McGuirk, Hovingh and Lutz <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />The motion failed. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />J annary 11, 1995 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.