My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2004-48
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
PC-2004-48
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:32:33 AM
Creation date
3/23/2005 3:08:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/28/2004
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2004-48
DOCUMENT NAME
PADR-932/PV-98
NOTES
JEAN-LUC & MAUREEN CHATELAIN
NOTES 3
TO LEGALIZE AN EXISTING TWO-STORY ACCESSORY STRUCTURE W/2ND UNIT ON 2ND FLOOR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Resolution No. PC-2004-48 <br />Page Three <br /> <br />dimensions and/or lot area. Therefore, this finding for the setback variances can <br />be made. <br /> <br />Slooing Plane Variance. As stated above, if the applicant's lot met the minimum <br />RM-4,000 district standard of70 feet, the sloping plane setback variance would <br />not be needed. Additionally, sloping plane variances have previously been <br />granted to properties in the Downtown area with the same zoning designation and <br />the same lot dimensions. Therefore, this finding for the sloping plane variance <br />can be made. <br /> <br />Building Height Variance. The Downtown location is unique and the structure's <br />design and steeply pitched roof would complement the existing house and would <br />be in keeping with the character of the Downtown. Most of the properties are <br />substandard in lot width, depth, and/or are and was the primary reason the height <br />variances were granted. Although there is not a direct relationship between lot <br />area/lot width and building height, property owners tend to "build up" to achieve <br />additional floor area when space on the ground is limited. Since the subject lot is <br />also constrained in lot width and area, it would not be granting the applicants a <br />special privilege to allow the retention of the existing 25-foot tall building. In <br />addition, approving a height variance in the Downtown to match the design and <br />roof pitch of the existing house would be consistent with the previously granted <br />variances in the Downtown area. Therefore, allowing the variance would not be <br />precedent-setting, and this finding for the building height variance can be made. <br /> <br />3. Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, <br />safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in <br />the vicinity. <br /> <br />Setback Variances. As noted above, substandard lots and buildings are not <br />uncommon in the Downtown area. The City's main concern with <br />non-conforming setbacks is that the building code requirements are met. In this <br />case, it is possible to bring the structure up to Code, thus alleviating public health <br />and safety concerns. Therefore, this finding for the setback variances can be <br />made. <br /> <br />Slooing Plane Variance. The sloping plane setback is designed to allow for open <br />space for light, air, and views between two adjacent properties, to reduce the bulk <br />of the structure, and to provide adequate separation of structures for privacy. The <br />existing two-story accessory building is located in the rear yard, approximately <br />ten feet behind the rear wall of the neighbor's house at 4420 First Street. In <br />addition, the existing accessory building is approximately 25 feet form the <br />adjoining property to the south. Thus, given the distance between the subject <br /> <br />Ifl . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.