PC-2004-39 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2004-39 Page Two 2. The design ofthe subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. Project construction would involve site grading and alteration of existing topography. Previous geotechnical work on this site indicated that the overall site is suitable for the development types covered by this subdivision, identified the presence of relatively stable soils, and did not identify the presence of geotechnical hazards. Subsequent engineering geotechnical analysis would be completed in conjunction with the improvement plans to finalize design details. Site-specific soils analyses would be required for the individual homes to determine foundation designs. In addition, no significant existing drainage course would be altered. Therefore, this finding can be made. 3. The design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their habitat. Grading has been designed to minimize impacts on adjoining properties. Although proposed lots are flat-pad lots, the graded areas would be designed to drain away from existing hillside/open space areas. In addition, adequate access is provided to all structures for police, fire, and other emergency vehicles. Furthermore, erosion control and dust suppression measures will be documented in the final subdivision map and will be administered by the City's Building and Public Works Departments. Therefore, this finding can be made. 6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposed project, including the recommended conditions of approval, meets all applicable City standards pertaining to public health, safety, and welfare, e.g., vehicle access, geologic hazards, and flood hazards. All public safety measures are addressed through the design and conditions of approval for the tentative subdivision map. Therefore, this finding can be made. 7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements do not conflict with easements for access through or use of the property. Public road connections would be provided to all proposed lots, and no existing easements would be affected by the proposed subdivision. Therefore, this finding can be made.